浅析Android开发文档的SexualActivityRecord类

刚刚网上冲浪看到 reddit 热门被吓一跳,还以为 Android 搞了个大新闻,瞬间标题都想好了:谷歌 Android 系统逆天操作 —— 监控 “为爱鼓掌” 频率。

成都网站设计、做网站服务团队是一支充满着热情的团队,执着、敏锐、追求更好,是创新互联的标准与要求,同时竭诚为客户提供服务是我们的理念。创新互联公司把每个网站当做一个产品来开发,精雕细琢,追求一名工匠心中的细致,我们更用心!

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/16iy537/android_has_a_separate_class_and_documentation_to/

再看一眼,原来是说 Android 开发文档提供了用于记录性生活频率的 "SexualActivityRecord" 类。

https://developer.android.com/reference/androidx/health/connect/client/records/SexualActivityRecord

那就看看谷歌工程师如何编写这个类。

可以看到这个类总共有 3 个常量,代表了 Sex 是否采取保护措施:

  • 1:已做安全保护
  • 0:未知
  • 2:无安全保护

公有方法主要有 getProtectionUsed()、getTime()、getZoneOffset()。

前面两个都能理解,获取保护措施情况和发生时间,但最后的 ZoneOffset 是啥意思?麻烦大佬们解答一下。

众所周知,Kotlin 早已成为 Android 官方支持的开发语言,所以这个类的代码也是 Kotlin 写的,总共不到 100 行:

SexualActivityRecord.kt

/*
 * Copyright (C) 2022 The Android Open Source Project
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package androidx.health.connect.client.records

import androidx.annotation.IntDef
import androidx.annotation.RestrictTo
import androidx.health.connect.client.records.metadata.Metadata
import java.time.Instant
import java.time.ZoneOffset

/**
 * Captures an occurrence of sexual activity. Each record is a single occurrence. ProtectionUsed
 * field is optional.
 */
public class SexualActivityRecord(
    override val time: Instant,
    override val zoneOffset: ZoneOffset?,
    /**
     * Whether protection was used during sexual activity. Optional field, null if unknown. Allowed
     * values: [Protection].
     *
     * @see Protection
     */
    @property:Protections public val protectionUsed: Int = PROTECTION_USED_UNKNOWN,
    override val metadata: Metadata = Metadata.EMPTY,
) : InstantaneousRecord {
    override fun equals(other: Any?): Boolean {
        if (this === other) return true
        if (other !is SexualActivityRecord) return false

        if (protectionUsed != other.protectionUsed) return false
        if (time != other.time) return false
        if (zoneOffset != other.zoneOffset) return false
        if (metadata != other.metadata) return false

        return true
    }

    override fun hashCode(): Int {
        var result = protectionUsed
        result = 31 * result + time.hashCode()
        result = 31 * result + (zoneOffset?.hashCode() ?: 0)
        result = 31 * result + metadata.hashCode()
        return result
    }

    companion object {
        const val PROTECTION_USED_UNKNOWN = 0
        const val PROTECTION_USED_PROTECTED = 1
        const val PROTECTION_USED_UNPROTECTED = 2

        /** Internal mappings useful for interoperability between integers and strings. */
        @RestrictTo(RestrictTo.Scope.LIBRARY)
        @JvmField
        val PROTECTION_USED_STRING_TO_INT_MAP: Map =
            mapOf(
                Protection.PROTECTED to PROTECTION_USED_PROTECTED,
                Protection.UNPROTECTED to PROTECTION_USED_UNPROTECTED,
            )

        @RestrictTo(RestrictTo.Scope.LIBRARY)
        @JvmField
        val PROTECTION_USED_INT_TO_STRING_MAP = PROTECTION_USED_STRING_TO_INT_MAP.reverse()
    }

    /** Whether protection was used during sexual activity. */
    internal object Protection {
        const val PROTECTED = "protected"
        const val UNPROTECTED = "unprotected"
    }

    /**
     * Whether protection was used during sexual activity.
     */
    @Retention(AnnotationRetention.SOURCE)
    @IntDef(
        value =
            [
                PROTECTION_USED_PROTECTED,
                PROTECTION_USED_UNPROTECTED,
            ]
    )
    @RestrictTo(RestrictTo.Scope.LIBRARY)
    annotation class Protections
}

好了,本次分享到此为止,欢迎大家各抒己见。如果让你来负责写这个类,会怎么实现?

新闻标题:浅析Android开发文档的SexualActivityRecord类
当前网址:http://www.hantingmc.com/qtweb/news13/272013.html

网站建设、网络推广公司-创新互联,是专注品牌与效果的网站制作,网络营销seo公司;服务项目有等

广告

声明:本网站发布的内容(图片、视频和文字)以用户投稿、用户转载内容为主,如果涉及侵权请尽快告知,我们将会在第一时间删除。文章观点不代表本网站立场,如需处理请联系客服。电话:028-86922220;邮箱:631063699@qq.com。内容未经允许不得转载,或转载时需注明来源: 创新互联